The phrase "a provision explicitly" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific clause or condition that is clearly stated in a document or agreement.
Example: "The contract includes a provision explicitly stating the terms of payment."
Alternatives: "a clause clearly" or "a term specifically".
Namely, his right to veto Mueller's most important decisions if Barr deemed them inconsistent with DOJ practices — a provision explicitly granted to the Attorney General in the special counsel regulations.
For example, Nigeria, Africa's most populous country, more than doubled its immunization budget from 2010 to 2012 and passed a new national health bill that includes a provision explicitly guaranteeing public immunization financing.
Yet neither provision explicitly prohibits interference by a political entity.
This mandate could include a provision that explicitly forbids the states from participating in a wholesale data dump to the federal government that could be used for the confiscation scenario that many gun owners fear.
Such an exemption would not be unprecedented -- Louisiana's workplace drug testing statute contains a provision that explicitly excludes NFL and NCAA athletes from its regulations.
But Mr. Gianaris, a Democrat, and the nonpartisan government watchdogs argued that a section of the New York State Public Officers Law, which governs powers and duties of state officials, allows the governor to fill elected offices for which there is no provision explicitly spelling out how the vacancy should be handled.
So, in attacking this provision of the deal (that is, the amount of LEU transferred), Friedman is attacking a provision that was explicitly endorsed by President Obama a week before the deal was signed - although, to be fair, you wouldn't know that if you were relying on the New York Times for your information.
WASHINGTON — Lawmakers charged with merging the House and Senate versions of the National Defense Authorization Act decided on Tuesday to drop a provision that would have explicitly barred the military from holding American citizens and permanent residents in indefinite detention without trial as terrorism suspects, according to Congressional staff members familiar with the negotiations.
At issue was a provision of Title VII that explicitly protects employees from retaliation if they have complained about or otherwise opposed "any practice made an unlawful employment practice" under other provisions of the law.
Formally, under par 4 of the German law on collective bargaining deviations from the sectoral standards set in collective agreements are only allowed when the bargaining partners explicitly make a provision for them.
Silencing actions like that led, in 1935, to a provision in the National Labor Relations Act explicitly allowing employees to discuss wages with one another; more recently, Barack Obama signed an executive order prohibiting federal contractors from retaliating against employees who disclosed their salaries.
