Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(1)
We developed a protocol for review and followed PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analysis) guidelines [ 5].
Similar(59)
We developed a protocol for the review, including the review question, search methods, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the approach to assessment and data synthesis.
We followed standard systematic review methods 16 and established a protocol for the review (available from the authors on request).
As the Cochrane Handbook notes, early publication of a protocol for a review prior to knowledge of the available studies reduces the impact of review authors' biases and allows peer review of the planned methods [ 36].
By the end of the fellowship most fellows had a protocol for their review that was either an advanced draft or had been submitted to the respective review group.
A protocol for this review was developed in consultation with experts and is available on the PenCLAHRC website (http://clahrc-peninsula.nihr.ac.uk/systematic-review-of-patient-initiated-clinics.php).php
We did not register a protocol for the review.
A protocol for the review was developed in collaboration with a Cochrane information scientist.
A protocol for this review has been registered with PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Identifier: CRD42013005761).
We developed a protocol for the review and followed standard QUOROM reporting guidelines [ 5].
A protocol for this review was registered with PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (Identifier: CRD42013005761).
More suggestions(16)
a timetable for review
a venue for review
a database for review
a product for review
a list for review
a role for review
a response for review
a case for review
a copy for review
a challenge for review
a judge for review
a proxy for review
a proposal for review
a queue for review
a basis for review
a request for review
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com