This is further reinforced by Lindell and Perry's (2012) inclusion of protective responsibility perceptions within the social stakeholder perceptions component of PADM in a recent modification of the model.
These findings demonstrate the value of including VBN theory's ascription of responsibility concept in examinations of preparedness behaviors and support Lindell and Perry's (2012) inclusion of protective responsibility in their recent modification of PADM.
Taking into account these findings, Lindell and Perry's (2012) theory modification incorporates attribution of protective responsibility (i.e., ascription of responsibility) as part of PADM's perceptions of social stakeholders.
Both studies examine the level of protective responsibility that respondents attribute to various stakeholders (e.g., federal, state, and local government officials, the media, employers, university officials, friends/peers, family, and self) with regard to seismic hazards.
In a protective environment, everyone should take responsibility to ensure children are protected from violence, abuse and exploitation.
Smith was supposed to be wearing a protective boot and said she took responsibility for her actions.
Families are made aware of their responsibility to ensure a protective and supportive environment for their daughters in order to avoid ostracism and child abandonment.
Our task is to bridge that gap, to re-affirm our own responsibilities to build a protective environment around all children – an environment in which violence against children is history.
His sister is expecting a baby by a treacherous Swede, and his expectation of becoming a protective uncle gives him a sense of responsibility.
A protective opacity fell in naturally with the sense of responsibility that weighs on paternalism everywhere and at all times.
