It shows that an important node lies on a high proportion of paths between other nodes in the interaction network.
Thus, betweenness centrality shows important nodes that lie on a high proportion of paths between other nodes in the network.
The proportion of path coefficients signifies that psychological health shows the greatest impact on the QOL of males (26.74%) and females (27.17%).
This is taken into account in Figure 6 by expressing path length as a proportion of stimulus velocity.
As in Figure 3 for the static line task, we could have collapsed the data by expressing path length as a proportion of stimulus size (blur).
On the other hand, betweenness centrality of a particular species is the proportion of paths between any combination of two species in the network that pass through that particular species.
Incompatibilities between three or more loci are theoretically expected to be more common than incompatibilities between two loci, because a greater proportion of evolutionary paths to higher-order incompatibilities do not pass through a less fit intermediary (Orr 1995).
Indeed, composite sequences have a 17 times higher average betweenness (a centrality estimating the proportion of shortest paths in the network that pass through a node) than noncomposite sequences (2.7E-5 vs. 1.6E-6).
Data analysis focused on quantifying the proportion of the path choices selected by a dace on the basis of turbulence magnitude.
