The phrase "a proper characterization of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the accurate description or representation of a concept, idea, or phenomenon.
Example: "The study provides a proper characterization of the effects of climate change on marine biodiversity."
Alternatives: "an accurate depiction of" or "a suitable description of".
If this be a proper characterization of the bill the motion to dismiss must prevail, as a reference to prior decisions will show.
Despite several publications on liquid liquid core annular flow, no much work has been done towards a proper characterization of the effect of gas on pressure drop.
The axes of the prismatic hull represent the amplitudes of the stress history along its directions, allowing a proper characterization of non-proportional loadings.
A proper characterization of the quality of interface adhesion requires knowledge of two quantities: the adhesion energy Γ0 and the adhesion strength σ̂.
Accurately estimating a structure's broadband response is highly dependent on a proper characterization of the system's internal damping as well as induced (or effective) damping when coupled systems are considered.
A proper characterization of the neat humins in terms of solubility, flow behaviour and thermal resistance is essential in order to find the optimal parameters of processing humins solutions as well as co-reactive mixtures for impregnations or to prepare composites.
I think a more proper characterization of a starter marriage would be that it is simply the first of X number of tries.
Salah Salahadyn: You called me an idiot, bumbling, whatever, but that's not a proper characterization at all of me, and I'd like to try and rectify that.
However, we believe that a proper characterization and fundamental investigation of the structure at room temperature can give precious insights for further improvements of novel light-sensitive devices as near-IR photodetectors, linear arrays, and camera matrixes, by implementing metamorphic QDs.
A discussion of a proper characterization method for selecting the maximum rated junction temperature for devices operating at high temperatures is given by comparing the different testing methods: Static performance (including and excluding self-heating effects), Short Circuit Safe Operating area and High-Temperature Reverse Bias.
However, a proper characterization and a systematic evaluation of these services within a high risk, resource intense group of patients such as those with CKD have not been undertaken.
