However, no such propensities were noted in the placebo group.
However, at higher filler contents a decreased propensity for crystallization was noted, which again indicated network formation.
In fact, a protective effect at 30 days was noted after propensity score matching [ 9, 14, 15].
No obvious correlation between aggregation propensity and age of onset was noted (Fig. 4).
A propensity for expansion of single Th-17, single Th-1 and double-positive Th17/1 cells was noted (Figure 5).
However, a propensity toward alternative splicing has also been noted in genes that have unusually large distances (from 40 bp up to 400 bp) from the identified branch point to the acceptor site, and this interim sequence is hypothesized to contain splicing signal motifs [ 41].
It should be noted that propensity score techniques exist for observational (nonrandomized) studies with multiple treatments (Imai and van Dyk 2004; McCaffrey et al. 2013), doses of treatment (Imbens 2000; Rosenbaum 2002), and treatments at school level (Stuart 2007).
It should be noted that propensity scores can be used as instrumental variables, when a suitable instrument is found.
It has been noted that lincRNAs have a propensity to be transcribed from bidirectional promoters (Cabili et al., 2011; Pauli et al., 2012; Ulitsky and Bartel, 2013).
However, it should be noted that the propensity for differentiation along a specific lineage can vary amongst MSCs derived from different sources.
However, it should be noted that the propensity score matching method was applied in a manner that was able to estimate approximate unbiased treatment effect for both SFN and HAIC in advanced HCC patients.
