a profound dearth of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "a profound dearth of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a significant lack or scarcity of something, often in a formal or academic context. Example: "The research highlighted a profound dearth of reliable data on climate change impacts in developing countries."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

With its newest appointees, the team represents decades of experience dealing with addiction from both political and medical standpoints, as well as an overall sense of dedication to the cause something for which Christie, in his years as governor, has demonstrated a profound dearth.

Forbes

I have a profound loathing of them.

Independent

"He has a profound love of America".

The New York Times - Books

A dangerous dearth of respect in society?

The Guardian - Opinion

Nick Frost's character is a walking dearth of subtext.

The Guardian - Film

It displays a corporate dearth of any imagination whatsoever.

The Guardian - Arts

There was a curious dearth of nominations for Virginia Woolf.

The Guardian - Books

BuzzFeed does have a notable dearth of serious news.

TechCrunch

She discovered that there was a shocking dearth of information.

HuffPost

There's still a real dearth of moistness out there.

Vice

There is therefore not so much a dearth of leaders as a dearth of followers.

Harvard Business Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using this phrase, ensure that the noun following "of" is specific and clearly defines what is lacking. For example, "a profound dearth of qualified candidates".

Common error

Avoid using "a profound dearth of" to describe trivial or insignificant shortages. The word "profound" suggests a deep and impactful absence, so reserve this phrase for situations where the lack is truly substantial and meaningful.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "a profound dearth of" functions as a determiner phrase, specifically highlighting a significant absence or lack of something. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is grammatically correct. The examples showcase its use in formal contexts to emphasize a notable deficiency.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

33%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "a profound dearth of" is a grammatically sound phrase used to describe a significant lack or scarcity, as validated by Ludwig AI. Although not extremely common, it's appropriate for formal and scientific contexts where emphasizing the severity of a deficiency is crucial. Alternatives such as "a significant lack of" or "a severe shortage of" can be used in less formal settings. When employing this phrase, ensure it aligns with the gravity of the situation to avoid misuse in trivial contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

a significant lack of

This alternative offers a direct and easily understood way to express a substantial absence of something.

a severe shortage of

This phrase emphasizes the urgency and criticality of the lack.

a marked absence of

This alternative highlights the noticeable quality of the lack.

a deep deficiency of

This suggests a fundamental inadequacy or incompleteness.

a glaring scarcity of

This emphasizes that the lack is obvious and conspicuous.

an extreme paucity of

This phrase uses a more formal term to denote a very small quantity or amount.

a notable inadequacy of

This highlights that something is insufficient or not good enough for a specific purpose.

a striking want of

This alternative, while less common in modern usage, indicates a conspicuous absence.

a critical deficit of

This suggests that the lack is causing significant problems or challenges.

an acute undersupply of

This phrase points out an insufficient amount being provided or available.

FAQs

How can I use "a profound dearth of" in a sentence?

This phrase is used to describe a significant lack or scarcity of something. For example, "The study revealed "a profound dearth of" reliable data on the subject."

What are some alternatives to "a profound dearth of"?

You can use alternatives like "a significant lack of", "a severe shortage of", or "a marked absence of" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "a profound dearth of" or "a significant lack of"?

Both phrases are correct, but "a profound dearth of" is more formal and emphasizes a deeper, more impactful lack than "a significant lack of".

What is the difference between "a dearth of" and "a profound dearth of"?

The addition of "profound" intensifies the meaning of "a dearth of", indicating that the lack is not only present but also significant and impactful.