The phrase "a process of discourse" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the nature or method of communication, conversation, or dialogue in various contexts, such as academic writing or analysis of communication.
Example: "The study focuses on a process of discourse that shapes public opinion during political campaigns."
Alternatives: "a method of communication" or "a form of dialogue."
Through a process of political discourse and persuasion, liberal societies move toward democracy as a way of respecting and realizing the rights of all to participate in a polity, subject to some basic conditions.
Rather, justice amounts to that set of principles that are established in practice and rendered legitimate by the actual support of affected citizens (and their representatives) in a process of collective discourse and deliberation (see e.g., Fraser 1997, 11 40 and Young 2000).
For him the cognitive procedure is a process of discovery (see Discourse on the Method, Part 6, 6) of what already is out there as the real nature of things created by God by finding out the clear and distinct ideas we can have of them (Discourse, Part 4, 3 and 7).
Despite various limitations, the greatest success of the ICC was to provide an opportunity for ordinary poor women to become engaged in the process of discourse and dialogue about health-related information on their doorstep.
The unity of the transnational community is sustained by the desire to belong to a "people" through a process of nominal appropriation of its actions and discourses, a sense of participation in its "destiny".
We must define and implement a process of governance in our country built upon civil discourse and critical thinking.
The colonial discourse of mimicry therefore "emerges as the representation of a difference that is itself a process of disavowal" (Bhabha 1994, 86).
Economist and statistician M. Godet [17, 18] attempted to give a stronger quantitative impulse to the concepts of Berger [19] and de Jouvenel [20], which were concerned more with qualitative research methods and creative processes of discourse.
The benefit of this architecture is to establish a systematic approach to understand cognitive process of interpretive (hermeneutical) discourse, develop a new frame of discourse processes and procedures for the fusion of intentions and provide a systematic procedure to transmigrate the frame of discourse into intelligent communication agents.
Do they have any authentic role to play in the process of public discourse and debate?
