The phrase "a prior study with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referencing a previous research study that involved a specific subject or methodology.
Example: "According to a prior study with a similar sample size, the results indicated a significant correlation between the variables."
Alternatives: "an earlier study involving" or "a previous study utilizing".
Concentrations of interleukin 6, obtained from a prior study with an estimated physiologic fetal circulation rate of 4 mL/min, were compared with the low and high perfusion rate results.
Differences between the data pattern observed in the present study with lateralized retrieval and that in a prior study with lateralized encoding [Evans, K. M., & Federmeier, K. D. (2007).
We chose medium complexity programming topic since in a prior study with PVs, Urquiza-Fuentes and Velázquez-Iturbide (2013) had found active learning strategy with PV had positive effect on learning of programming topics of medium complexity in contrast to topics of low and high complexity.
Different reports, however, suggest that not all secretory vesicles fuse with the plasma membrane (reviewed in [48]), which supports a prior study with a sec6 C. neoformans mutant [16] and our current observations with S. cerevisiae strains showing that post-Golgi secretion events are required for the release of extracellular vesicles.
Interestingly, in a prior study with a diverse group of NPSLE participants, we found strong correlations between cognitive dysfunction and fatigue, pain, depression, and perceived dysfunction [ 11].
Data from the Women's Health Study (WHS), which had been included in a prior study with the Nurses Health Studyy (29), were included in the meta-analyses.
In a prior study, colonoscopists with mean cecal insertion to mean withdrawal time ratios <1 detected significantly more adenomas compared to colonoscopists with ratios >1 [ 14].
However, the relationship between RNMT and RNA pol II is complex; in a prior study, treatment with DRB for 8 h did not inhibit recruitment of RNMT [ 15].
In addition, a prior study of workers with CTS showed that few patients leave their jobs following a diagnosis of CTS.
Comparable to a prior study in adults with TS performed by the same group, no significant differences could be detected in volume, shape, or right/left asymmetry.
In a prior study on patients with SIRS and suspicion of having community-acquired infections in a non-intensive care setting suPAR was found to have a low accuracy in diagnosing bacterial infection in SIRS patients [ 17].
