The phrase "a principle requiring" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a fundamental rule or guideline that necessitates certain actions or behaviors.
Example: "The organization adheres to a principle requiring transparency in all its operations."
Alternatives: "a rule mandating" or "a guideline stipulating".
I might reject a principle requiring me to devote all my time and energy to charity, not simply because of the burdens it imposes on me but because, in leaving me no room for my own personal projects, it fails to respect me as a person.
A principle requiring us to protect the range of capabilities for people (either equally or to some sufficient level) would also provide a basis for keeping people functioning normally through universal access to interventions that reduce the health risks to them or that treat them for departures from normal functioning.
In a landmark custody case on the interpretation of the BIC, the ECtHR described the BIC as a principle requiring primary consideration in decision-making concerning children.c The Court added that the principle could, depending on the nature and seriousness of the situation, override parental interests.
Obviously, it does not trumpet the indivisible Internet as a principle required under international norms, though it makes obeisance to freedom of expression.
Then came Bohmian mechanics, a theory which has made clear, in a lucid and perfectly consistent way, that there is no reason of principle requiring a dichotomic description of the world.
Justifying a methodological principle requires answering a pragmatic question: why does it make practical sense for theorists to adopt parsimonious theories?[8] Most attention in the literature has centered on the first, epistemic question.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. appeared skeptical of adopting an across-the-board First Amendment principle requiring secrecy.
The demand for justification of such principles can be understood in two importantly distinct ways, corresponding to the distinction between epistemic principles and methodological principles made at the end of Section 1. Justifying an epistemic principle requires answering an epistemic question: why are parsimonious theories more likely to be true?
Revlon duties, a Delaware law principle, require a company that has decided to sell itself to accept the highest price reasonably available.
On the second interpretation (i.e., the absolute one), the demands of egalitarianism are essentially non-comparative: a 'priority of health' principle requires that a given person have as much health as possible, as judged by some non-comparative metric (e.g., absolute years of life expectancy).
Finally, he says, graphene detectors would in principle require a simpler and potentially less expensive process to integrate them on a silicon chip.
