The phrase "a previous study performance" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the results or outcomes of a study that was conducted before the current one being discussed.
Example: "The researchers compared the results of the current experiment with a previous study performance to assess improvements."
Alternatives: "an earlier study outcome" or "a prior study result."
What is lacking in this approach to protocol design is an understanding of how data on previous study performance and on the complexity of a study can be used to assess a study's feasibility and likelihood of success during the protocol design process.
In a previous study, the performance of UHPC slab under blast loads had been investigated through free air explosion tests.
In accordance with the WHO approach in a previous study [ 3], performance outcomes were dichotomised into good performance (combining responses very good and good or always and usually) and poor performance (combining responses poor and very poor or never and sometimes).
A previous study of enzymatic performance (activity and stability) was carried out using a design experiment methodology.
We can confirm this by referring to a previous study on the performance overhead [21], in which Cassandra and MongoDB were used as the baseline for comparison.
A previous study evaluated the performance of eight published anti-TNF gene expression classifiers using a single dataset, GSE33377 [ 16].
The CRT is a task with conflicting heuristic and correct responses, and a previous study demonstrated that performance on the CRT was linked to WM-capacity [ 23].
A previous study [26] examined the performance of both downlink and uplink satellite quantum communication designs under various conditions.
In a previous study, we reported the performance of a PCR assay amplifying 285-bp of the invA gene of Salmonella spp. through an international ring-trial involving four participating laboratories [Int. J. Food Microbiol. 89 (2003) 241].
A previous study also found good performance with an opponent channel model, similar to the hemispheric model we tested in our study (Stecker et al., 2005).
