Sentence examples for a previous release of from inspiring English sources

This sample, taken from a previous release of the solo session, provides a good idea of the new reissue's delights.

A previous release of "Infinite Jest" for e-readers solved the footnote challenge by embedding them as hyperlinks, but that option is not available on an audio recording.

Programs marked by an asterisk were not included in a previous release of the ViennaRNA Package.

Compared to a recent analysis of promiscuity rates, which also included a previous release of DrugBank, the average promiscuity rate of approved drugs further increased from 5.9 to 7.5, while the degree of promiscuity among bioactive compounds remained essentially constant.

A previous release of the Generation R data from 2009, included only individuals whose samples were collected at birth, and who were classified as of Northwestern European origin (N = 2661) following the same steps mentioned above, and has been used in some publications [ 10, 26, 27].

Liverpool have ignored a previous release clause of £40m plus £1 initiated by Arsenal last summer, however.

"There are several irregularities, but a fundamental point is that a previous release order of habeus corpus was still in place, and my client was respecting its conditions, so it should have taken precedence over the second detainment order.

Briefly, we select all the newly added Swiss-Prot sequences in the Release 5.0 of UniProt, i.e. not included in a given previous release of this database, and compare their functional annotations in UniProt 5.0 with our functional predictions using a version of EFICAz trained with the given previous release of UniProt.

After the acceleration of HD collections last generation, it can feel like every third PS4 or Xbox One game is a remaster of a previous release.

An aftershock results from the sudden change in stress occurring within and between rocks and the previous release of stress brought on by the principal earthquake.

Following the previous release of emails scientists highlighted by the controversy have been vindicated by independent review, and claims that their science cannot or should not be trusted are entirely unsupported.