Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSimilar(60)
Each trial comprised a 500 ms fixation cross, a 2000 ms word presentation window, a 500 ms response window, and a 500 ms feedback where "O" and "X" were displayed for correct and incorrect trials, respectively.
These MEPs had the particularity to be computed within the stimulus presentation window.
The stimulus sizes were 2° × 2°, and the presentation window was 3.5° × 3.5°.
These rates are somewhat inflated by the high number of contacts within the short, two-month presentation window (which averaged over one contact per month).
(6) The minimum fixation for the first stimulus prior to fixation was set at.70 of the total possible gaze samples available during the presentation window (including interpolated data).
In panel C, error bars are missing for the drep-2 trace during the odor presentation window (in my copy, at least).
The allocation of PAS clients (N =1997) to baseline clinical groups was hierarchical in nature, with priority given to any evidence of psychosis in the period up to and including the two-month PAS presentation window.
Any recorded psychosis episodes with dates before the PAS referral date were regarded as 'existing psychosis' episodes, while those falling (or assessed) within the PAS presentation window were regarded as 'recent psychosis' episodes.
With respect to the first reported episodes within the PAS presentation window (N =395), half (57%) were identified from PAS clinical information, 9.9% came from inpatient records, and 33.2% from community records.
Those in the existing psychosis group had the highest aggregate contact rates per client per year (1.25), while the UHR and recent psychosis groups had the highest level of PAS contact during the presentation window (averaging 3.16 and 2.96 contacts, respectively).
During the first 26 months after PAS referral (i.e., the presentation window plus 2 years), the average number of PAS contacts was 4.86 (SD =6.89, median =2, range 1 to 64); three-quarters (76.4%) of which occurred within 8 months of PAS referral.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com