The phrase "a preponderance of more" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It seems to be an attempt to express a greater quantity or dominance of something, but the wording is awkward and redundant.
Example: "The study showed a preponderance of more evidence supporting the hypothesis, but the phrasing was unclear."
Alternatives: "a greater amount of" or "a majority of".
Following Johnson's and Davis' exit, May's new Cabinet boasts a preponderance of ministers far more aligned to a softer form of Brexit.
Thus the selection of cases cannot be considered representative of all diagnosed cases and may result in a preponderance of features characteristic of more advanced cases with larger tumors or may under-represent metastatic cases that frequently do not undergo nephrectomy.
"Starting with Mitchell and Jones, there was a preponderance of advisers who were more in tune with the Palestinian narrative than the Israeli narrative," said Abraham H. Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League and a friend of Mr. Ross.
Generally, he is forced to rely on a preponderance-of-evidence standard: 'more evidence exists to suggest that actors of black, native, and mixed origins especially griffes rather than whites participated in Atlantic networks that brought knowledge of cattle herding to the Attakapas [in Louisiana]' (p. 96).
If more energy is available, possibly due to a preponderance of intestinal Firmicutes or methanogens, more energy can be stored.
Chain topology, however, is known to influence the folding reaction, in that motifs with a preponderance of local interactions typically fold more rapidly than those with a larger fraction of nonlocal interactions.
A recent review (Swannell et al., 2014) suggests that, while clinical samples of those engaging in NSSI include a preponderance of females, gender equivalence is more characteristic of samples not selected for presence of disorder, such as the one studied here.
There were also substantial differences in use of aldosterone antagonists (22.5/28.7%) and vasodilators (36.8/45%) between the RDN/sham limbs at baseline, respectively, and a preponderance of African-Americans, who are more likely to respond to these drug classes, in the sham group (29.2% sham vs 24.8% RDN).
An increasing number of people, and the preponderance of more virulent abuse, have rendered that advice less helpful.
