The phrase "a prejudicial impact on" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the negative effects or consequences that something may have on a person, group, or situation.
Example: "The new policy may have a prejudicial impact on the minority communities in the area."
Alternatives: "a detrimental effect on" or "an adverse influence on".
Nielson said the use of lyrics in court can have a "significant" prejudicial impact on jurors.
"The reasonable inference is to induce that Mr. Pettitte got it from Mr. McNamee, and I just think there's too much potential for that having prejudicial impact on Mr. Clemens," Walton said.
The changing environmental setting and its prejudicial impact on human health have also stirred scientists to search for nonconventional methods of treatment of various maladies.
In regards to the identification of associated factors, it is noteworthy that tooth brush frequency was virtually indicative of protection against prejudicial impacts on OHR-QoL.
Oddly, discrepant results were obtained by questions 1 and 2. Question 1 (on the overall perception of oral health) revealed a higher prejudicial impact than question 2 (on how much oral health affects life overall).
This conclusion is consistent with previous studies that report the prejudicial impact of oral lesions on the OHR-QoL of adults who were affected [ 14] and unaffected [ 15] by the HIV infection.
"The court repeatedly acknowledged the highly prejudicial impact that rap lyrics can have on a jury… In the judiciary today, that's not happening with rap, and the consequences are often grave, especially for amateur rappers," he added.
"In any issue like this, the judge has to do a balancing act in terms of how relevant the testimony is against any unfair prejudicial impact it might have," Loyola law professor Laurie Levenson said.
Mr. Pan's lawyers also wrote to the judge, accusing prosecutors of failing to appreciate the "likely prejudicial impact" of the arrests last week, adding, "At worst, the decision was an improper attempt to bolster what we believe the evidence will show to be a weak case brought for the wrong reasons".
Social media is unfettered by rules of evidence that weigh credibility, materiality, and prejudicial impact.
