The phrase "a precise rule" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific guideline or regulation that is clearly defined and unambiguous.
Example: "In our organization, we follow a precise rule regarding attendance to ensure fairness among all employees."
Alternatives: "a specific guideline" or "a clear regulation".
In nature, there is nothing so neat as our idealized flower algorithm; we cannot really hope to get a precise rule distinguishing between two types of flowers, but can hope only to have one that gives an approximate result with high probability.
According to the Hume-Rothery approach, e/a and the average radius can give a precise rule of thumb to identify the domain of stability of HEAs and to estimate the phases that may occur in the alloy: i) e/a< 1.65: fcc, ii) 1.65 < e/a < 2.05: mixed phases, iii) e/a > 2.05: bcc.
From there, through qualitative interviews coupled with analysis of experimental and survey data, Dunbar discovered that the number grows and decreases according to a precise formula, roughly a "rule of three".
If the hypothesis misclassifies an example, it is updated by a certain precise rule, and the new hypothesis is applied to the next example.
Although 'step-by-step' is not a precise legal rule it does have legal meaning as a principle guiding the risk assessment and management of genetically modified organism introduction into the environment.
However, even with this variable transformation, there seems to be little hope to derive a precise Kramers' rule for the stochastic Amari model (2) by generalizing the approach for SPDE systems [4, 6, 7].
Sample size was an important factor in these studies, for while there is no precise rule, there is general consensus that the AHP does not require a particularly large sample [ 23].
No precise rule of thumb exists to link that figure and the health of reefs.
The precise rule for selecting the values of L and D will depend on the environment, and notably on the mobility model, and so is omitted here.
While it is unclear whether DNAJB6 follows this precise rule, it is abundantly clear that the protein prevents aggregation of varied misfolding-prone proteins [ 6, 8, 9].
In the context of a possible lack of precise rules on forest accounting under the Paris Agreement, the approach proposed here, compatible with the new EU legislation, may represent a precedent that helps other countries to make the forest sector more comparable to other GHG sectors, and therefore supports the much-needed credibility of the forest sink mitigation [2].
