The phrase "a precise exposure of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a clear and detailed presentation or revelation of information or ideas.
Example: "The report provides a precise exposure of the underlying issues affecting the community."
Alternatives: "a clear presentation of" or "a detailed disclosure of".
They included German Church Office, German-Protestant Mass, Protestation or Defense…Regarding the Beginning of the True Christian Faith and Baptism, Of Written Faith, and Precise Exposure of False Belief.
Nevertheless the amount of excipients in drug formulations is rarely reported in the SPCs making the evaluation of precise exposure and assessment of true harmfulness of these substances to neonates impossible.
One obvious approach to the problem is to obtain more precise exposure estimates instead of correcting for a known or suspected extent of exposure miss-measurement.
A precise and sensitive exposure of the site of inflammation may contribute producing a wide-ranging impact on the pro diagnosis and treatment of the disease.
To reduce the risk of non-differential misclassification, a precise definition of exposure is mandatory and it is important to distinguish the complete follow-up period of a population into mutually exclusive episodes of non-use, past use and current use for each individual.
13 20–23 Although exposure to vibration during the working life was self-reported, it corresponded to a very specific exposure, probably with a low memory effect (workers tend to remember correctly this type of precise exposure).
The lack of precise exposure data likely led to exposure measurement error and/or exposure misclassification in these epidemiology studies.
This account requires that one accepts the reported exposure and disease information in the epidemiology studies as true, even though the lack of precise exposure data likely led to exposure measurement error and/or exposure misclassification that could have biased results, and disease misclassification in these studies likely led to unreliable risk estimates.
Further, our sensitivity analyses, using a less-precise exposure estimate, showed an attenuation of the effect size.
Future studies should emphasize the use of the most precise exposure indicators in sensitivity analyses to model the impact of likely imprecision (Budtz-Jørgensen et al. 2003).
