Exact(4)
In July, after receiving a 10 out of a potential score of 100 in UCS's 2015 Palm Oil Scorecard and pressure from consumers, Starbucks responded.
The total score for each domain was divided by the number of items answered, yielding a potential score of one to seven, with higher numbers representing better function.
Reporting on any item within a domain would result in a fractional score and each domain had a potential score of one.
Completion of the ACT resulted in a potential score of between 5 and 25; a score of ≥ 20 indicated "well-controlled" asthma and a score of <15 suggested "poorly controlled" asthma.
Similar(56)
Each subsection consists of 48 figures, and participants had 90 seconds a subsection to complete as many items as possible; this gave a maximum potential score of 144 and a minimum score of 0. Subsections were administered in a counterbalanced sequence to account for order effects.
There was a total of six questions assessing affective perspective-taking, yielding a maximum potential score of 12.
Assuming a maximum potential score of 30 (3 centrality measures multiplied by the individual score of 10), the deviation from the maximum score was calculated for each feature.
For the data analysis, the scores were inverted to give a total potential score of 36 (normal).
Each component of the three dimensions was awarded 1 point if the paper achieved the minimum defined requirement and cumulative scores for each paper were calculated with a maximum potential score of 11.
This method of settling a potential score makes sense — particularly considering that a lawsuit could force an artist to forfeit the right to profit from his song.
Only N-glycosylation sites with a "potential" score > 0.5 and board agreement of "++" or higher) were considered as positive in our analyses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com