The phrase "a possible template for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a model or example that could be used as a basis for something else.
Example: "This document serves as a possible template for future project proposals."
Alternatives: "a potential model for" or "a possible framework for".
A performance space, Firehouse 12, is drawing packed houses, providing a possible template for clubs catering to avant-garde tastes.
He calls it a breakthrough in the campaign against the Taliban, and a possible template for peacemaking in Afghanistan.
When Thomas Jefferson passed through, in 1788, he sent a sketch of the street plan back home, as a possible template for the layout of Washington, D.C.
Ernst Vegelin van Claerbergen, head of the Courtauld Gallery, said the exhibition "will provide a milestone in the study of Goya's drawings and a possible template for future study.
It's riveting theater, and John Birmingham, a columnist writing in The Sydney Morning Herald, noted that the speech had been seen as "a possible template for Obama to review before he gloves up to face Romney in their second debate".
The intense back and forth suggests a possible template for how the two parties might interact next year when Republicans control the House and have added to their numbers in the Senate.
Aaker and Chang [1] propose the formula Story = Situation/Desire Complication/Obstacles - Solution/Outcome for describing a possible template of a story.
Another case study to back the idea of a single provider operating a number of subsidiaries cites as a possible template the for-profit AMEOS German hospital group which runs 68 facilities in Germany and Austria and provides a significant amount of public healthcare.
A possible template mechanism and affecting factors for the morphological selection of electroless metal deposits are discussed.
Today's independent central banks provide a possible template.
Possible templates for modeling were sought at the META server, a portal to the several fold recognition methods (Bujnicki et al., 2001) and to the 3D-Jury consensus method, by which scores of over 50 are taken as highly confident (Ginalski et al., 2003).
