Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
The phrase "a positive large" is not correct in written English.
It is not a standard expression and lacks clarity; "positive" and "large" do not typically modify each other in this way.
Example: "We need to find a positive large number that meets the criteria."
Alternatives: "a large positive" or "a significantly large".
Exact(3)
Now, let i ∈ { 1, …, p } and let M 1 be a positive large constant.
Now, let (i in{1,ldots,p}) and let (M_{1}) be a positive large constant.
The standardised mean difference for the intervention was 2.35 (95% CI 2.07 to 2.62), representing a positive large effect.
Similar(57)
The presence of chaotic behavior is evidenced by a positive largest Lyapunov exponent computed for the output time series.
For all forces with odd polynomials and a positive largest coefficient, cubication is more accurate than linearization for large amplitudes, and for all amplitudes if f(x) has a cubic and no linear term.
For the ML model, we observe chaotic dynamics around a strange attractor, where small perturbations can grow, leading to a positive largest Lyapunov exponent of 0.6738.
Thus, any large solution of (2.9) provides a positive entire large solution ( U, V ) of (1.1) with U ( 0 ) = c and V ( 0 ) = d.
And returns based on the deluxe model had a positive skew: large windfalls were more likely than big losses.
Furthermore, a positive and large effect size between the number of detected street-level and raised-level advertisements was also found.
The MIVs appeared as an osmium-positive, large, vacuole-like structure (Figure 5F and Figure S8).
There was a significant difference in nodal stage between the patients with a BRAF-positive largest tumor and a BRAF-negative largest tumor: 11 of the 16 patients (69%) with a BRAF-positive largest tumor had cervical lymph node metastases (either N1a or N1b) compared to 2 of the 11 patients (18%) with a BRAF-negative largest tumor (P = 0.02).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com