The phrase "a population different from" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing or contrasting one population with another, highlighting the differences between them.
Example: "The study focused on a population different from the one previously examined, revealing new insights into their behaviors."
Alternatives: "a population distinct from" or "a population unlike".
Inverse probability weighting (IPW) is a statistical technique developed for surveys by Horvitz and Thompson ([1952]) to calculate statistics standardized to a population different from that in which the data was collected.
Showing a new sequence type, our data confirm that the horse isolates form a population different from human isolates.
Our study is a cohort that represents a population different from those in prior studies of veterans [ 1] or intravenous drug abusers [ 7].
An a priori assessment of the accuracy and validity of a risk algorithm should be performed when one is applying it to a population different from the one in which it was developed.
In a limited number of cases, we also evaluated the effect of SNP ascertainment bias when SNPs were selected in a population different from the target population, as opposed to ascertaining the SNPs in the same population.
However, this could also mean that LD is in fact not perfect in a particular GWAS sample, as a result of employing a population different from those represented in HapMap.
Although FP-biotins are excellent probes of serine hydrolases and other OP-reactive proteins, the long lipophilic tethers and attenuated reactivity as a phosphonate compared with phosphate likely select for a protein population different from that of the OP oxon structures.
In particular, neonates should be considered a separate population, different from older children, and several thromboembolic diseases, such as ischemic arterial stroke, are not comparable to AIS in adults.
While the majority of adult-born DGCs labeled by BrdU were located close to the hilus, the LacZ-positive and EGR1-positive DGCs were distributed throughout the granule cell layer and their locations were significantly further from the hilus compared to those of adult-born DGCs, suggesting that they represented a DGC population different from the adult-born DGCs.
Of interest, studying a patient population different from ours but with similar risk profiles, Senn et al. [ 17] showed that all of the false-positive BG assay results (4%) were observed in patients with gastrointestinal fungal colonization and/or mucositis who received empirical therapy, suggesting an occult IC at an early stage.
Third, no study validated their model using a dataset and population different from the one to which the model was calibrated.
