Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
Therefore, this aspect was labeled with zero points for a "poor" answer, three for a "satisfactory" and six for a "good" answer, whereas in contrast, the other two aspects of content quality (completeness and openness) were scored with zero, one and two points for a "poor", "satisfactory" or "good" answer, respectively.
Similar(56)
8 of the 11 patients with cut-out achieved only a poor to satisfactory outcome score.
SRH was classified as poor, satisfactory, good and excellent.
The primary intent of such certification is to identify poor, satisfactory or exemplary performance.
SRH status is based on one question and categorized as poor, satisfactory, good and excellent.
Altogether, poor, satisfactory, good and excellent health was reported by 11.8%, 53.7%, 31.0% and 3.2% of the responders, respectively.
For statistical analyses, the PFI was categorized as poor (combination of categories fair and poor), satisfactory, or good (good and excellent) [ 17].
Quality of bowel prep was subjectively recorded as poor, satisfactory or good by the endoscopist at the time of the procedure.
Similarly, for all symptoms responders preferred a good or very good chance of a satisfactory outcome, and preferred not to have a poor or fair chance of a satisfactory outcome.
Main outcome measure Probability of obtaining a poorer versus a more satisfactory category of outcome at ARCP following successful registration as a doctor in the UK.
The scores reported in general resident research surveys were also based on a 1 to 5 scale (1 poor 2 satisfactory 3 average 4 good 5 excellent).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com