Sentence examples for a poor coefficient of from inspiring English sources

A statistical study of the inter-relationship between fluoride and calcium concentrations for low fluoride range (Table 2, Fig. 1) showed a poor coefficient of correlation (dolerites/basalt dykes, rhyolites n = 12 and r = − 0.08) but data presented in Fig. 2 suggest that many of the waters may be at or approaching equilibrium with respect to fluorite.

Ayral et al. [ 1] reported a poor coefficient of reliability (0.27 0.73) based on a review of the grading of cartilage lesions made by nine surgeons.

The perception of safety inside the home had an excellent coefficient for researcher-administered questionnaires and a poor coefficient for self-administered questionnaires.

However, pseudo-first-order and intraparticle diffusion plots have poor coefficient of correlation (Table 7).

Comparison of bias CItd-CIpc to "time to last calibration" provided poor coefficients of partial correlation rpart and p-values in evaluation-collective (rpart = -0.09; p = 0.536), validation-collective (rpart =0.083; p = 0.605) and merged data (rpart = 0.076; p = 0.363).

The SF6 resulted in large coefficients of variation (ranging from 16.0 to 111%) for CH4 emissions and a poor relationship (coefficient of determination = 0.17) between CH4 emissions and DMI, likely because of limited barn ventilation and high background gas concentration.

Of the 96 items, five (5%) had an excellent kappa coefficient, thirty (31%) had a moderate to good kappa coefficient, and 61 items (64%) had a poor kappa coefficient (including the 15 items of which we set negative variance components to 0).

Four items had a moderate to good kappa coefficient, and four items had a poor kappa coefficient.

As shown in Figure 4, estimated VDphysiol/VT systematically underestimated measured VDphysiol/VT, with a poor concordance correlation coefficient of 0.19 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.091 to 0.28), a bias of 0.16 and an agreement between -0.05 and 0.37.

This is in agreement with the view that temporal variation in selection means that selective mortality in one time period is a poor predictor of selection coefficients during other time periods (Kekäläinen et al. 2009).

The aerobic production of lactate leads to an increase in the amount of ATP produced per time unit at the expense of a poorer yield coefficient.