Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "a pool of evidences" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct term is "a pool of evidence," as "evidence" is an uncountable noun.
Example: "The investigation revealed a pool of evidence that pointed to the suspect's guilt."
Alternatives: "a collection of evidence" or "a body of evidence."
Exact(1)
Thus, the purpose of this systematic review and met-analysis was to determine the pooled effect of health facility delivery on neonatal mortality by reviewing a pool of evidences from studies conducted all over the world.
Similar(59)
It is a pool of evidence which in one way seems to tell you everything and in another way is open to interpretation".
The outcomes distinguish utopia from reality, introduce a pool of evidence that can justify whether a city can claim to be smart and depict a brief view of the future smart city.
We also propose potential ways to address these gaps to improve the quality of AMR data and build a pool of evidence-based data for this region.
This approach, together with the establishment of a robust regional surveillance network, should over time build a pool of evidence-based data useful for policy decisions and interventions aimed at controlling antimicrobial resistance.
There is also a growing pool of evidence that meditation may bring a variety of health benefits including lower blood pressure.
There is a growing pool of evidence available to guide resuscitation and fluid administration practices.
More broadly, these results also contribute to a growing pool of evidence demonstrating the capability of relatively novel sources such as web-based data to assist with public health goals.
There is a large pool of evidence associating sedentary behavior with increased obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk, as well as premature mortality, but only a suggestion that interventions that decrease or interrupt sedentary behavior in the work environment may improve metabolic risk (98– 100).
The normal controls were from a pool of volunteers with no evidence of eye disease.
Our original approach of having two independent experienced evidence reviewers (out of a pool of nine) review and categorize the evidence for each recommendation led to too much inconsistency due to the variability of the recommendations and the type of evidence required for each recommendation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com