The phrase "a point corroborated by" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when you want to emphasize that a particular point or statement is supported or confirmed by evidence or another source.
Example: "The findings of the study are a point corroborated by numerous experts in the field."
Alternatives: "a point supported by" or "a point confirmed by".
The river systems that established themselves across these newly emergent land surfaces of the coastal plain would have created important migration corridors for both animals and humans, a point corroborated by the affinity of Palaeolithic remains across Britain and Europe.
For example, in the United States youth themselves cite feeling competent, valued, safe, and secure as important to their sense of well-being (Fattore et al. 2007), a point corroborated by youth development researchers (Lippman et al. 2009), yet related measures are rarely captured in indices of child well-being.
That was a point corroborated last night by sources close to the player.
These factors increase both the women's risk of being victimized, and their risk of justifying violence against them – point corroborated by Heise, 1998 [ 36].
This point is corroborated by a study that claims that catechins are already known for their antimutagenic and cancer preventive properties [ 20, 21].
Comparing and contrasting our analysis of the development cases across developed, transitioning, and developing economies, we note a number of points partly corroborated by earlier conceptual and empirical research.
This point is corroborated by thin-plate spline analysis and dramatically illustrated in our 2 color matrix-labeling experiments; e.g. compare the size of the green staining vj veil to the much larger size of the green staining vp region that grows out by incremental banding growth in Figure 3E.
This point is corroborated by examination of the corresponding calcium transients shown in Figure 6c.
The latter point is corroborated by the subtle differences in the transcriptomes of the three different childhood phenotypes that we studied.
This point corroborates the limitations identified by Hayward & Hofer [ 8], i.e., that studies based on peer review are characterized by a high degree of subjectivity in the judgment of the reviewers.
But he insists that he is intensely competitive, a notion corroborated by his friend and training partner, Deb Robertson.
