The phrase "a plausible explanation is" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when introducing a reasonable or believable rationale for a situation or phenomenon.
Example: "After reviewing the evidence, a plausible explanation is that the increase in temperature is due to climate change."
Alternatives: "a reasonable explanation is" or "a credible explanation is".
A plausible explanation is that lateralized brain structures beyond auditory cortex may facilitate the discrimination of these temporal features.
A plausible explanation is that Macquarie has experts in, say, airport management and finance that others do not.
A plausible explanation is that private benefits of control, a cost to minority shareholders, increase over firm maturity at dual-class firms.
A plausible explanation is less-structured environments that require heavier process of searching and/or selecting increased demand of cognitive load imposed.
A plausible explanation is size.Size matters when world trade is falling because large economies have millions of domestic consumers to turn to when foreign markets fail.
"It seems to me that a plausible explanation is that it got put into orbit, and stayed up long enough to get cataloged," said Brian Weeden, the director of program planning for the Secure World Foundation, a think tank.
(A plausible explanation is that humans can only cope with a few close friends, and the friendship quota for popular kids is more rapidly filled; having many friends makes people less inclined to seek new ones).
A plausible explanation is that a lot of the tumors would not have killed people even if left alone, while the truly lethal tumors were not caught in time.
A plausible explanation is that employers reward the social habits and discipline that youths gain from staying in school to graduate, even when their academic level is below what we now want graduates to achieve.
A plausible explanation is that the thrombin site adjacent to LL-37 is less accessible due to the peptide's aggregation tendency and cleavage at the remote site generates a fragment, which forms a large aggregate that buries the intended site.
A plausible explanation is the fact that nanofluid suspension does not significantly change viscosity of the fluid.
