The phrase "a plausible conjecture" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a theory or idea that seems reasonable or likely to be true based on available evidence or reasoning.
Example: "After reviewing the data, the researchers proposed a plausible conjecture about the relationship between the variables."
Alternatives: "a reasonable hypothesis" or "a credible assumption".
The somewhat overwhelming effect of a Fuller monologue is well known today in many parts of the world, and while his claim to Maori ancestry must remain open to question, even that seems an oddly plausible conjecture.
We know so little about this painter that writers assume a licence to stray from even plausible conjecture into pure fiction.
Newton hoped to analyze the dynamical interactions that hold the solar system together; he wanted to show that his dynamical account, and the view of "the frame of the system of the world" that emerges from it, is a matter of "reasoning from phenomena" rather than of plausible conjecture.
Because nobody knows how such an AI might be built, Mr Bostrom is forced to spend much of the book discussing speculations built upon plausible conjecture.
To retell this history, Carroll persuasively takes the reader through much that he acknowledges is plausible conjecture, informed theory and reconstructed history.
An equally plausible conjecture is that advanced students spend more time because they are more engaged in the process of discussion, more engaged in the material, and/or simply have more practice and comfort engaging in the process of argumentation.
A. Some of the factors that lure mosquitoes are well known, like carbon dioxide emissions, body heat and moisture, and there have been many plausible conjectures about variables that a sufferer might be able to control, like avoiding perfume and possibly even adopting a vegetarian diet.
How zebras got their stripes Michael Lemonick | New Yorker | 11 April 2014 An obvious question for students of evolution to ask; hard to answer – not because plausible conjectures are lacking, but because there are too many.
Averill 1992, 2005, for example, presents some interesting arguments, which are based on plausible conjectures about how normal observers and standard conditions might easily enough change, with consequent metameric change.
