Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(4)
There is pathos in the story of a planet that would seem to have had the promise of a much longer biography.
If it should turn out in the years to come that Earth is not actually a very good example of a planet, that would not be the first instance in which astronomers have painted themselves into a corner, linguistically.
It's a war that could ensure that something lasting comes out of 9/11, other than longer lines at the airport -- and that something would be enhanced respect for America and a country and a planet that would be greener, cleaner and safer in the broadest sense.
The first is the "Goldilocks Zone," which refers to the set of conditions on a planet that would allow life to develop.
Similar(56)
A massive conspiracy to cover up the presence of a hidden planet that would be perturbing the orbits of the moon and man-made satellites is almost as extraordinary a claim as the existence of such a planet.
In 1843 the British mathematician John Couch Adams began a serious study to see if he could predict the location of a more distant planet that would account for the strange motions of Uranus.
There is not a business on this planet that would still be going with those type of results.
"There wouldn't be a sane person on the planet that would want to write that policy".
A group of NASA scientists are proposing a new definition of the word planet that would reinstate Pluto's status – and add tens of other bodies including Earth's Moon and moons like Titan.
Think of an iron lung for the planet that would allow us to dial in the kind of climate we want.
The world's astronomers came to their senses yesterday and approved a new definition of the word "planet" that would drop tiny Pluto from the club and relegate it instead to a lesser realm of "dwarf planets". It was a welcome step away from a proposal that would have kept Pluto as a planet but simultaneously opened the door for dozens of small, icy bodies on the fringes of the solar system.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com