The phrase "a phenomenon for which" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific phenomenon and the context or reason related to it.
Example: "Climate change is a phenomenon for which scientists are still seeking comprehensive solutions."
Alternatives: "an occurrence for which" or "a situation for which".
Epidemiologically, food allergies parallel the steep rise of other contemporary epidemics like asthma, diabetes and autoimmune diseases — a phenomenon for which there has been no convincing explanation.
The recent divorce between the old and the young, a phenomenon for which both parties must take responsibility, neutralises some of the greatest gains since humanity formed complex social groups 50,000 years ago.
That renaissance is a phenomenon for which any lover of African literature must be grateful, for not since the early 1970s has much emerged from the continent that has been able to make a global impact.
Attention was increasingly treated as a phenomenon with explanatory work to do, and so as a phenomenon for which a substantive independent theory needed to be given.
Due to high asset specificity, large farms may be more dependent on the stability of the milk deliveries and certainty over the buyer for all of their production, a phenomenon for which Pascucci et al. (2012) provided evidence among Italian agricultural producers.
Extinction of a function is a phenomenon for which there exists a finite time T > 0 such that the solution is nontrivial on ( 0, T ) and then u ( x, t ) ≡ 0 for all ( x, t ) ∈ Ω × [ T, + ∞ ). In this case, T is called an extinction time.
The aim of an epistemic discourse is to find the most adequate description or explanation of a phenomenon (for example, which physical impacts are to be expected by the emission of specific substances?).
Superfluid turbulence, often referred to as quantum turbulence, is a fascinating phenomenon for which a satisfactory theoretical framework is lacking.
Aging is a complex phenomenon for which a universally accepted explanation is still lacking.
To complicate matters, even among Republican Primary voters who are not Tea Party adherents and acknowledge that global warming exists, a goodly number consider the temperature rise a natural phenomenon for which mitigation efforts would be a waste of time and money.
But what exactly makes these people part of a "general phenomenon" for which there can be a single explanation?
