"But as a product reaches a certain scale, a person is expected to be a corporation".
And how much baggage, exactly, can a person be expected to hump around?
As the concept of mianzi plays a significant role in social interaction and the operation of each person's social network, a person is expected not only to look after their own face but also to maintain the face of others.
How can a person be expected to survive -- much less thrive -- on that fuel?
Special Rules: If a person is expected to live for six months or less, AA and DLA claims are prioritised, less information is required on the application form and the applicant does not have to prove how much care they need.
Once upon a time an educated person was expected to know how Latin's plurals worked, and so we have a bias towards knowing Latin's rules.
A Renaissance person was expected to sing, take an instrument, or compose their own music.
When the screening question was answered positively (ie, headache was reported in the last year), and the person was present, the full interview was conducted immediately; otherwise, an appointment was made for a return visit when the person was expected to be at home.
As the Justice Department points out in its guidelines for charging a corporation with a crime: "A corporation, like a natural person, is expected to learn from its mistakes," and "a history of similar misconduct may be probative of a corporate culture that encouraged, or at least condoned, such misdeeds, regardless of any compliance programs.
What kind of risk to self and family should a moral person be expected to take in opposing a terrifying regime?
