Sentence examples for a person affirmed from inspiring English sources

No other study has been located that compared two subjective measures; it is noticeable that the MST, which utilizes a single question relating to the presence or absence of lymphedema, gave a lower prevalence estimate than the LBCQ, where classification of lymphedema was made where a person affirmed one or both of two separate items.

In the context of fatigue, the Rasch model simply states that the probability of a person affirming an item is a logistic function of the symptom severity the person experiences and the severity of the symptom measured by the question.

Thus, for example, in the case of mobility, the probability of a person affirming a (dichotomous) item about mobility is a logistic function of the relative distance between the level of mobility expressed by the item (the item difficulty), and the level of mobility of the person (the person ability).

Thus, we may say that a person affirms his life in Nietzsche's sense only insofar as he would gladly will its eternal return: i.e., will the repetition of his entire life through eternity.

But Carlos Cuevas, a Chicago immigration judge with a far-from-bad reputation, ordered them back to Macedonia, and the appeals board — actually just one person — affirmed his decision.

Because the meanings of the two sentences are different, the corresponding beliefs are different, and this explains how it is possible for a person to affirm one and deny the other without being irrational.

In other words the probability that a person will affirm an item is a logistic function of the difference between the person's level of, for example, mental well-being, and the level of well-being expressed by the item.

In other words, the probability that a person will affirm an item is a logistic function of the difference between the person's ability and the difficulty of the item [b] (i.e. the ability required to affirm item i), and only a function of that difference.

Formally the probability that a person will affirm an item (in its dichotomous form) is a logistic function of the difference between the person's ability and the difficulty of the item [b] (i.e. the ability required to affirm item i), and only a function of that difference.

Notwithstanding this dependence on the notion of judgment, however, truth, for Brentano, is not a subjective notion: if one person affirms an object and another person denies the same object, only one of them judges correctly.

Airhihenbuwa [ 122] wrote that a person's identity is affirmed by his or her family, and one acting as an individual within the African context is a no person.