The phrase "a pattern of a monkey" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing a specific design, behavior, or characteristic that resembles or is inspired by a monkey.
Example: "The artist created a unique fabric with a pattern of a monkey, which became the highlight of the collection."
Alternatives: "a design featuring a monkey" or "a motif of a monkey."
A closer look reveals a pattern of copulating monkeys, among even less decorous images.
In contrast, the W92A and T45S W92A substitutions decrease activity on ethanol by ∼400-fold but increase activity by 3 9-fold on hexanol (an ∼1000-fold inversion of activity), with a pattern of activity that resembles that observed with monkey ADH1A.
Furthermore, the face patch resting state networks and the default mode network in monkeys show a pattern of overlap akin to that between the social brain and the default mode network in humans: this overlap specifically includes the posterior superior temporal sulcus, medial parietal, and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex, areas supporting high-level social cognition in humans.
Additional converging evidence for the adaptive looming bias hypothesis comes from comparative work on rhesus monkeys who show a pattern of response to looming versus receding sounds that mirrors that found in humans (Ghazanfar, Neuhoff, & Logothetis, 2002; Maier, Chandrasekaran, & Ghazanfar, 2008; Maier & Ghazanfar, 2007; Maier, Neuhoff, Logothetis, & Ghazanfar, 2004).
The earliest experiments in this area revealed that neurons flash in the brain of a monkey watching another monkey peel a banana in the exact pattern of the monkey performing the action ("monkey see, monkey do").
We found an opposite pattern of lateralization for monkeys responding to intra-group stimuli between the processing of positive and negative sounds (Fisher tests: IGP vs IGN, p = 0.05; EG1P vs EG1N/EG2P vs EG2N, p>0.05 – Fig. 1A).
After this treatment, a clear and vivid pattern of monkey (Fig. 1i) was created due to the in situ formation of ZIF-8.
