The phrase "a pathology for which" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific medical condition or disease and the context in which it occurs or is relevant.
Example: "The study focused on a pathology for which there is currently no known cure."
Alternatives: "a condition for which" or "a disease for which".
Re "2 Portraits of Children of Divorce" (March 26): If divorce is not viewed as a pathology for which one is at risk, at least some children of divorce who later become divorced may benefit from having as role models parents who can make choices when they find themselves in untenable situations.
Since stroke has a vascular etiology, changes to CVR, especially within the infarct and the peri-infarct tissue, might be expected, making this a pathology for which this simple measure of CVR may be well used.
Imagine that you have a child, a wanderer by nature, who gets caught up in a war that has persisted aimlessly for many years; his roaming has festered into a chronic pathology for which there is no known cure.
By Virginia Cannon June 15 , 2014Imagine that you have a child, a wanderer by nature, who gets caught up in a war that has persisted aimlessly for many years; his roaming has festered into a chronic pathology for which there is no known cure.
All consecutive adult patients (>18 years of age) suffering from a non-malignant musculoskeletal pathology for which a diagnostic and/or therapeutic procedure (puncture, or infiltration, or both) was carried out at the time of consultation were recruited (maximum of 40 patients per rheumatologist).
Several medications (beta blockers, statins, and oral hypoglycaemics) were also associated with reduced vasorelaxant responses to CBD, but it is not yet clear whether this represents a drug drug interaction, or whether it is a result of the pathology for which the medication is being taken.
The College of American Pathologists (CAP) cancer protocols and checklists are an important reporting standard in pathology, for which no complete electronic data standard is currently available.
A potential criticism of our study is that the pathology for which the lobectomies were performed might have influenced the citrullination in the samples examined.
The fact that, in almost 80% of the cases, the parents could name the pathology for which the child was hospitalised, gave us a certain degree of confidence in the information supplied.
There may be damage leading to osteoarthritis many years later but this would be attributed to the pathology for which the original injection was administered or to the indication for arthroscopy, if the injection was given post operatively.
"Red flags" may indicate serious pathology for which more appropriate medical intervention is required.
