The phrase "a particular questionnaire" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific questionnaire that is distinct from others in a given context.
Example: "In our study, we distributed a particular questionnaire designed to assess participants' mental health."
Alternatives: "a specific questionnaire" or "a certain questionnaire".
For example, in the study by Goodwin and colleagues [ 29] a psychosocial parameter (avoidance) was found to be important when assessed with a particular questionnaire, but this finding was not substantiated when using another questionnaire.
In order to reduce random sources of error and be able to assess the reliability and validity of a particular questionnaire it has been suggested to formulate and use summated or multi-item scales [ 30].
Use of two different measures helps ensure that findings will be generalizable, rather than artifacts of a particular questionnaire, and the large sample sizes provide sufficient power for item-level EFAs.
Criteria for instrument selection have often been based on whether a particular questionnaire is reliable and valid with respect to the patient population in question but this is changing.
To perform a simulation for a particular questionnaire, the program needs (a) estimates of its GRM parameters and (b) a data file with scores on its items from a sample from the population in question as input.
All cost prices included in the analyses were valued in terms of integral cost prices [ 16]. in the original database an average of 0.5 cases per item were randomly missing because some patients had failed to answer all questions of a particular questionnaire.
This measure is particularly appealing for use with children with severe SLI due to the use of visual cues and developmentally appropriate language (consistent with the expected reading level of a child below the youngest target age of the particular questionnaire version) [ 9, 18].
For this particular questionnaire, the coefficient H values ranged from 0.70 (social congruence) to 0.80 (subject-matter expertise), with an average 0.75.
Thus, patients would not directly benefit medically from this particular questionnaire compilation as their doctors would not be invited to see the answers or make clinical decisions based upon them.
However, the distribution of scores at specific time points in this group of patients was compared with, and found similar to, the distribution among all patients completing that particular questionnaire.
One particular questionnaire design feature, asking about future intentions to get screened before asking about past screening behavior, has been found to increase the accuracy of the latter when compared to medical records, possibly because respondents are under less social pressure to over-report past practice of that behavior [ 6].
