The phrase "a particular judgement" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a specific decision or conclusion made about a situation or individual.
Example: "In the case of the defendant, the jury reached a particular judgement that reflected the evidence presented during the trial."
Alternatives: "a specific decision" or "a distinct conclusion".
According to Brentano all universal judgements (both (A) and (E)) are negative and therefore lack any existential import, whereas all particular judgements (both (I) and (O)) are positive and have such import.
If this diagram is really from the November report, and really is this shoddy, it would raise more questions, remembering that this particular judgement helped trigger the EU oil embargo and new US sanctions.
Applying Hilpinen's definition we capture two more particular judgements, in addition to those already mentioned, that seem intuitively acceptable: that C is closer to the truth than A, and that D is closer than B. (Note, however, that we have here a partial ordering: A and D, for example, are not ranked).
We thus demonstrate that the choice of health inequality measure implies a particular vertical equity judgement, which may be expressed on a common scale in terms of the CI of health changes that would be inequality preserving.
We further show that the choice of health inequality measure implies a particular vertical equity judgement, which may be expressed on a common scale in terms of the concentration index of health changes that would be inequality preserving.
As Fries and Krishnan argued, and as most Bayesians also accept, this approach to the decision to run a trial, and to design in it a particular way, involves subjective judgements about what is important and about what it is fair to offer patients.
In most circumstances, our reports represent clinical consultations, giving our specialist opinion ("a view held about a particular subject or point; a judgement formed; a belief" [5]) on the basis of the information available at the time (which may be limited or incomplete), having weighed the available evidence [6].
They represent clinical consultations, resulting in opinions which are conclusions arrived at after weighing of evidence [3]; "opinion" can be defined as "a view held about a particular subject or point; a judgement formed; a belief" [4].
I think that's just a statement of the obvious as I say, and that is not to make particular comment or pass judgement on a particular provider".
Once it is informed of a particular case, it makes a judgement about whether the content is "potentially illegal" or not, and assesses the severity of the offence on a five-point scale.
