Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "a paper review" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to the evaluation or critique of a written document, typically in an academic or professional context.
Example: "After submitting my research article, I eagerly awaited the feedback from the peer review process, which would include a paper review by experts in the field."
Alternatives: "a manuscript evaluation" or "a document assessment".
Exact(6)
"It's a paper review".
"Dateline" interviews a former State Farm executive who says, "There's only one motivation for using a paper review, and that's to increase profits by reducing costs".
The practice, known as a "paper review," falls under the critical gaze of "Dateline NBC" tonight in a segment that proves network news magazines can still produce compelling reports in a genre that has lately seemed desperate for material.
The process of code reviewing in software engineering is analogous to a plan review in civil engineering or a paper review in academia.
(A paper review outside the detainee's presence is supposed to take place annually).
In a paper review process and after a manuscript is accepted for publication, the private files can be changed to public by the submitter.
Similar(54)
Graphene's strength, thinness, and chemical properties could make it the "ultimate" membrane material for desalination, MIT researchers David Cohen-Tanugi and Jeffrey Grossman wrote in a paper reviewing some of the progress researchers have made.
A full paper review was performed for the remaining publications by two other randomly allocated reviewers.
"From this experience, I learned what kinds of things to pick out in terms of writing a good paper review".
After a serious paper review performed by the Technical Program Committee only 116 submissions were accepted, leading to a paper acceptance ratio of 65%%.
A full paper review was then conducted on all those that met the general inclusion criteria.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com