The phrase "a pair of trial" is not correct in English.
Did you mean "a pair of trials"? If this is the case, you can use this phrase when referring to two instances of testing or experimentation.
Example: "The researchers conducted a pair of trials to determine the effectiveness of the new drug."
Alternatives: "two trials" or "a couple of trials".
The company is operating the service under a private hire licence from Transport for London, following a pair of trial "smart bus" routes in the capital.
A quantitative assessment of the spatial and rate similarities between a pair of trial types.
(A ) The similarities were measured between a pair of trial types (VD1, VD2, VD3, VD4, SA1, SA2, DA1, and DA2) or between repeated exposures to an identical trial type.
The score for a pair of trial types or repeated exposures was obtained by calculating the unsigned difference between the rates in the two trial types or repeated exposures and dividing the difference by the sum of the two rates.
To compare the relative information content among them for neuronal ensemble activity of each rat, I quantitatively assessed the performances of the binary classification of neuronal trajectories in the central stem of the maze between a pair of journeys irrespective of subtask, between a pair of task-demands irrespective of journey, and between a pair of trial types.
The stories told in a pair of trials in federal courtrooms in Lower Manhattan and Central Islip have been heartbreaking.
The resulting model RDM was a 360 × 360 matrix, where the value in each cell reflects the cosine distance between the semantic coordinates of a pair of trials.
The activation pattern RDMs were symmetrical 360 × 360 BOLD matrices, where the value in each cell reflects the dissimilarity (1 Pearson's correlation) of activation patterns between a pair of trials.
The results of experiment 3 show that performance was much better for the second than the first in a pair of trials with the same CLT.
The drugs have lost favor with many doctors after a pair of clinical trials cast doubt on their effectiveness.
In a major study of mammography's effectiveness one of a pair of Canadian trials conducted in the nineteen-eighties women who were givenineteen-eighties womenast exams but no mammograms whoe compared were those who had thorougiveneast exams and regular mammograms, and no difference was found in thoroughh rates from breast cancexamstween the two groups.
