The phrase "a pair of duplication" is not correct in standard English.
The correct expression would typically be "a pair of duplicates" or "a pair of duplications," depending on the context.
Example: "In the experiment, we found a pair of duplicates that confirmed our initial findings."
Alternatives: "a set of duplicates" or "two instances of duplication."
Next, we present a novel probabilistic model of segmental duplication that we use to compute the likelihood score for an evolutionary relationship between a pair of duplication blocks.
Here, we present two methods for determining the optimality of an evolutionary relationship between a pair of duplication blocks—one based on a parsimony criterion and one based on a likelihood criterion.
Similarity is at a BLASTP bit score threshold of 500, with other parameters described in [ 21]. 7) Determine gene pairs in a gene family having the same coordinates as found in a pair of duplication blocks.
We use duplication distance to measure the similarity between a pair of duplication blocks by counting the number of operations needed to generate Y from X in a simplest or most-parsimonious scenario.
A pair of duplications (labeled A in Figure 2 and A1 and A1 in Additional files 11 and 14: Figures S8 and S11) must have occurred in the ancestral amniote lineage as three types of paralogous lysozyme g genes (LygA, LygB, and LygC) are found in birds and reptiles.
Reviewer 2: Centrosomes are formed by the recruitment of microtubule-organizing pericentriolar material (PCM) to a pair of centrioles whose duplication once per cell cycle ensures the presence of two microtubule-organizing centers in mitosis.
Here, we propose a method that takes a species tree and a set of gene trees as inputs, and models the gain and breakage of gene adjacencies along a pair of trees, taking duplications and losses into account.
A pair of processed pseudogenes located in segmental duplication pairs indicates that one of the pseudogenes was likely formed by the duplication of the other one and hence is a duplicated-processed pseudogene.
Following this assumption, stk33 could have undergone subfunctionalization, a process where a pair of genes that resulted from a duplication event retained different subfunctions of the original gene [ 46, 47].
We derived an efficient exact algorithm for computing the duplication distance between a pair of strings.
Does the preponderance of evidence favor the hypothesis of a very recent duplication to generate a pair of paralogs (SULT1A3 and SULT1A4)?
