Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
The phrase "a ordinary case of" is not correct.
It should be "an ordinary case of." You can use it when referring to a typical or common example of something.
Example: "This is an ordinary case of miscommunication that can happen in any organization."
Alternatives: "a typical instance of" or "a common example of".
Exact(1)
To the Manhattan district attorney's office, this is a ordinary case of grand larceny, with a narrow set of relevant facts: Mr. Haggerty deceived Mr. Bloomberg into giving him a lot of money by promising to provide a service — ballot security — that he never intended to deliver.
Similar(59)
To defend this, she invites us to consider an ordinary case of blame, say the blame we feel for a politician who leads us into a disastrous war.
But it was also not an ordinary case of abuse.
Dr. Raviglione of the World Health Organization estimated that drugs to treat an ordinary case of TB in Russia would cost $20.
"It's always difficult in an individual case to say depression or dementia is due to repeated blows sustained, be they boxers, jockeys, rugby players or American footballers, or whether it is an ordinary case of Parkinson's or depression.
Many now agree that the Greek problem is idiosyncratic, yet it has been treated as an "ordinary" case of macro-economic imbalance.
Though it's normal to be nervous if you're feeling scared or shy, the girl may wonder, "What's up with this guy?" She may think that there's something off about you even if you're having an ordinary case of the jitters.
This case report presents a seemingly ordinary case of pruritus in a patient several months after kidney transplantation that progressed to severe pruritus.
Whether or not this would suffice in an ordinary case brought under the review provisions of the APA, see 5 U. S. C. § 704, we have characterized the special judicial-review provision of the CAA, 42 U. S. C. § 7607(b), as one of those statutes that specifically provides for "preenforcement" review, see Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra Club, supra, at 737.
Whether or not this would suffice in an ordinary case brought under the review provisions of the APA, see 5 U.S.C. § 704 we have characterized the special judicial-review provision of the CAA, 42 U.S.C. § 7607(b), as one of those statutes that specifically provides for preenforcement review, see Ohio Forestry Assn., Inc. v. Sierra Club, supra, at 737.
The point here is that in this case, and in all ordinary cases of incredulity, the grounds for the doubt can, in principle, be removed.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com