The phrase "a one lag" is not correct in standard written English.
It seems to be a typographical error or a misunderstanding of the intended phrase.
Example: "The project experienced a one lag in its timeline due to unforeseen circumstances."
Alternatives: "a single delay" or "one setback".
Classical parameter estimation was applied with a one-lag autoregressive model and high-pass filter of 128 seconds.
After excluding brain cancers following a brain scan, we found that by 31 December 2007, there was one excess cancer for every 1800 CT scans based on a one year lag period, and one excess cancer for every 2200 CT scans based on a 10 year lag period (table 8).
For leukaemias and myelodysplasias, our estimate of the excess rate ratio per mGy was 0.039 955% confidence interval 0.014 to 0.070), based on a one year lag (table 8).
Based on a one year lag period, 680 211 (6.2%) were transferred into the CT exposed group before their exit from the study (table 1), and 18% of the exposed group had more than one scan (table 2).
In our study, the estimated excess rate ratio per mSv for all cancers except brain cancer after a brain scan was 0.035 955% confidence interval 0.026 to 0.042), based on a one year lag period (tables 8 and 9).
The estimated collective dose to red bone marrow, based on a one year lag period, was 4000 Gy, and the average estimated red bone marrow dose was 4.6 mGy per scan.
Based on a one year lag period, the collective effective dose from all CT scans combined was about 3900 Sv, and the average effective dose to all organs of the body was about 4.5 mSv per scan.
We found that results were not substantially changed if we used zero, two, or three year lags rather than a one year lag between our outcome and explanatory variables.
We started from the largest number of lags (lag 0-10), and reduced the total number of individual lags by back-eliminating the longer lags (e.g., lag 10) one lag at a time until a significant cumulative effect on ST-II was identified (lag 4 in this report).
Using PVC count per 30 min as the primary outcome variable, we started from the largest number of lags (lag 0 10) and reduced the total number of individual lags by back-eliminating the longer lags (e.g., lag 10), one lag at a time, until a significant cumulative effect from all the included lags (< 0.05) was identified (lag 0 1 for PVC in this article).
From this 10-lag significant cumulative-effect model, we reduced the total number of individual lags by back-eliminating the nonsignificant longer lags (e.g., lag 10), one lag at a time until a significant individual lag was identified (lag 7 in this report).
