Sentence examples for a numerical difference from inspiring English sources
Although a numerical difference is noted in favor of the MAM rats on the first nine sessions, none of these reached statistical significance.
There was a numerical difference for the change in total MADRS score in favor of lanicemine 100 mg over placebo at all visits (Figure 3).
A numerical difference scheme to solve stationary transport equations with spatially distributed coefficients is presented.
Figure 2a shows bilateral regions of negative correlation between age and FA (also see Table S1), with higher t-scores in the left than right hemisphere, however this is a numerical difference that needs robust statistical assessment.
A numerical difference for moderate and severe peripheral oedemas was also observed in favour of lumiracoxib, although it did not reach statistical significance.
While there was a numerical difference (lower) between control marks for the written report and the supervisor this failed to reach significance (t = 1.81, p = 0.07).
The U.S. EPA called the lowest dose in that study a LOAEL (lowest observable adverse effect level), whereas the NAS called it a NOAEL on the basis that, although there was a slight numerical difference from controls, it was not statistically significant.
Because of this reproductive potential, a difference of a few rapidly reproducing clonal offspring could quickly multiply into a vast numerical difference in clone copies, and may facilitate establishment in new environments.
In Exp. 2, VC and βC diets apparently reduced AFI (interaction, P<0.05), while a transient β-carotene effect (P<0.05) was evident in ADG during the second half of the experiment (270 vs. 240 g/d), thus resulting in a slight numerical difference in favor of β-carotene and vitamin C dietary additions in G F.
A slight numerical difference in favour of grape was noted for genes related to lignin biosynthesis and to berry specific pectins.
In addition, a large numerical difference was observed in subjects with mild renal impairment (37.8% vs 54.9%) but this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.055).
