The phrase "a number of logical" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to multiple logical points, arguments, or ideas in a discussion or analysis.
Example: "In the debate, she presented a number of logical reasons for her stance on the issue."
Alternatives: "several logical" or "various logical".
In addition to commentaries, he wrote a number of logical treatises, mostly simple explications of Aristotelian logic, but also two very interesting ones: (i) His On Topical Differentiae bears witness to the elaborated system of topical arguments that logicians of later antiquity had developed from Aristotle's Topics under the influence of the needs of Roman lawyers.
There are a number of logical possibilities.
Determined to uncover the mechanism of the paramutation, the researchers tested and ruled out a number of logical possibilities, such as DNA or histone methylation.
In addition to his translations, Boethius wrote a number of logical treatises of his own.
Resources can be split into a number of logical pieces which are called virtual machines.
In such an environment, a number of logical network instances (virtual networks) co-exist over a shared physical network infrastructure.
By walking readers through a number of recognized logical fallacies, in Chapter One, Fitch teaches students that arguments are not just one fact against another.
So the approach is to use a workload input size based on a number of active logical threads with fixed memory size per thread as indicated in Eq (1).
(1953, 32) {§6.8} It is certain that when I wrote "Systematically Misleading Expressions" I was still under the direct influence of the notion of an "ideal language"—a doctrine according to which there were a certain number of logical forms which one could somehow dig up by scratching away at the earth which covered them.
This architecture is very efficient, but it pays this efficiency with the use of a high number of logical resources, so we propose an alternative architecture slower but consuming much less resources.
Quine (1936, §III) famously criticized the Hobbesian view noting that since the logical truths are potentially infinite, our ground for them must not lie just in a finite number of explicit conventions, for logical rules are presumably needed to derive an infinite number of logical truths from a finite number of conventions (a point derived from Carroll 1895).
