Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
A notable difference was also found in the Pro content, between 16 and 36% in PRPs, while in STs it was lower than 11%.
Similar(59)
Differences were also found in patienthistory.
Gender differences were also found.
However, a notable difference was found in the main goals of these studies.
It is notable that a mutation of K186 was also found to abrogate the infectivity [14].
Notable differences were also seen among the different varieties.
The protein adsorption during giant reed hydrolysis at 13% WIS was also found to be independent of the impeller speed and the most notable difference between the materials was less adsorbed protein during giant reed hydrolysis compared to spruce hydrolysis.
Other notable results were also found.
Most of these genes were also found in other studies, including the recent TCGA HNSCC study, with some notable differences.
No notable difference was found among iPS clones from non-diabetic and diabetic patients.
As for the intraobserver reliability, no notable difference was found between ICC and Pearson's coefficient (Table 1).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com