Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(5)
The phrase "a normalized version of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a modified or standardized form of something, often in contexts like data processing, software development, or academic writing.
Example: "The researchers presented a normalized version of the dataset to ensure consistency in their analysis."
Alternatives: "a standardized version of" or "a modified version of".
Exact(28)
This prevents image interpolation errors in contrast to other techniques in the literature which embed the watermark in a normalized version of the image and afterwards apply inverse normalization.
The same techniques used to derive this new algorithm also provide a Bayesian interpretation for a normalized version of Winnow.
The paper includes (i) the analysis of the positivity of the obtained discrete-time SEIR model, (ii) the study of stability of the disease-free equilibrium point of a normalized version of such a discrete-time model and (iii) the existence and the attractivity of a globally asymptotically stable disease-free periodic solution under a periodic impulsive vaccination.
(6 Equation (6) corresponds to a normalized version of the dispersion relation in VTI media.
To derive a normalized version of the SCF, the Spectral Coherence Function (SOF) is given as.
(5.4) which is a normalized version of a problem dynamics model (see [11]).
Similar(32)
We remark that a
This measure represents a family of overlap measures quantifying similarity between nodes and a normalized version was specifically introduced for the study of the hierarchical modularity of metabolic networks and to delineate the functional modules based on the network topology [ 23].
This is combined with weighted log p-values calculated for the TF binding motifs (Q ik) and known gene associations (S ik) as g i k = r o log r ˜ i k + Q i k + S i k where log r ˜ i k is the a z-score normalized version of log r i k and r o is a weight for adjusting the relative importance of r ik.
An important subtlety however is that in (14), the expectation is over the, the true channels, whereas in (13) the are a per-coefficient variance normalized version of the, the channel estimates.
It means that the FxLMS algorithm with a fixed step size is changed to the normalized version of it.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com