The phrase "a non sensible" is not correct in standard written English.
The correct form would be "nonsensical" or "not sensible."
Example: "The argument he presented was completely nonsensical and lacked any logical basis."
Alternatives: "irrational" or "illogical."
Similarly, in its efforts to argue for a "necessary being," reason is forced (against its own argument) into a non-sensible realm.
Avicenna posits the existence of an estimative faculty in order to explain the innate ability in all animals (humans included) to sense a non-sensible intention (ma'nan) that is intrinsic to the object as perceived by the subject.
And it is this partially determined objectivity as itself a (non-sensible) object of thinking that Natorp considers the second-order phenomenon, even though he will usually just call it a "phenomenon," simpliciter.
One might be tempted to think that a word-meaning is composed of a non-sensible form (the ideal Bedeutung) and a sensible content, say, the acoustic data forming the distinctive sound of the word 'red' in English or those forming the distinctive sound of the word 'rosso' in Italian.
Rickert's ontology contemplates four "kinds of being (Seinsarten) of the world" (Rickert 1934b, 153): (1) sensible (sinnlich) being; (2) non-sensible (unsinnlich) being; (3) pro-physical (pro-physisches) being; (4) supersensible (übersinnlich) being.
This differential is the non-sensible being of the sensible, a being not identical to the sensible, or to itself, but irreducibly problematic insofar as it forces us to encounter the sensible as "given".
With such a huge majority, surely even a decidedly non-Sensible Labour candidate could pick up a by-election win.
On the one hand, there will be a host of non-sensible properties and propositions about ordinary particulars and such properties, e.g., 'Socrates is a man'.
According to this theory, there is a single, eternal, unchanging, indivisible, and non-sensible form corresponding to every predicate or property.
Looking at the works of a great artist we can understand one and the same non-sensible meaning-configuration (say, the same 'style') realized sensibly in different media.
In fact, the entities that we encounter and theorize about in the world of experience are always objects, in a broad sense comprising physical, psychic and non-sensible entities (meaning-configurations).
