The phrase "a new interrogation and" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It can be used when introducing a discussion or analysis of a new method or approach to questioning or examining a subject.
Example: "The researchers proposed a new interrogation and analysis technique to better understand the participants' responses."
Alternatives: "a fresh inquiry and" or "an updated examination and".
A classified memorandum issued by General Sanchez on Oct. 12, outlining a new "interrogation and counter-resistance policy," directs that "the interrogator should appear to be the one who controls all aspects of the interrogation... as well as food, clothing, and shelter given to the security internee," according to a briefing provided to Senate staff members last week by two senior Army officers.
Oct. 12: A new "Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy" is issued in wake of Miller visit/report.
He proposed establishing a new interrogation and debriefing center and ensuring that military police officers were assigned to help set the conditions for questioning.
Then, after a break long enough to claim that a new interrogation had begun, they gave her a Miranda warning and resumed questioning.
The military policeman had earlier told investigators the abuse would not have happened had senior officers been present thus supporting the administration's claim that a unit had gone awry.Yet even as Mr Sivits's trial was going on, accusations were growing that senior members of the administration and military officers had set up a new interrogation system that led, indirectly, to the torture.
On August 24th the White House announced that it would create a new interrogation team housed with the FBI, not the CIA.
The government then started a new interrogation for law-enforcement purposes, but after the captive was warned of his Miranda rights, he refused to say any more and remains in military custody in Iraq, the official said.
The order established a task force to develop a new interrogation strategy that would represent a "clean break" from the Bush years, anonymous administration officials bragged to The Washington Post.
In 2002, Dunbar and Swigert were contractors for the CIA's Office of Technical Services, but it was their previous work as psychologists for the U.S. Air Force Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) school that brought them to the attention of officials seeking to create a new interrogation program after 9/11.
Still, the missed deadlines seemed to underscore the gravity and complexity of the legal, political and policy problems confronting the administration as it tries to put into place new interrogation rules and figure out what to do with the detainees.
They say that it was lawful because leading Democrats in Congress were "fully" briefed about these new interrogation techniques and raised no objections.
