The phrase "a need for scientists" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the demand or requirement for scientists in a particular field or context.
Example: "In today's rapidly advancing technological landscape, there is a growing need for scientists to drive innovation and research."
Alternatives: "a demand for scientists" or "a requirement for scientists".
He quickly adds, though, that there is always a need for scientists trained in animal pharmacology.
But there is a need for scientists or people with a strong science background who are also good communicators.
Another place to consider is the chemical industry, where there is a need for scientists in quality assurance (QA) and QC who are well versed in chemical processes.
The importance of acceptance of science and technology by the public, alongside a need for scientists to become more accountable to the public, was also discussed.
This communication gap, combined with the growing importance of science and technology in society as a whole, has created a need for scientists who can work at the interface between science and public policy.
With "increasing recognition for the value of restoring ecoystems to their natural condition," Strowd sees a need for scientists trained in ecological areas, including biology, zoology, chemistry, and geology as well as environmental, civil, and mechanical engineers.
Increased complexity in biomedical research has distanced the laboratory from clinical scientists, and thus there is a need for clinical scientists who can serve as facilitators of the translational process.
And no matter what your field is, there is always a need for good scientists to communicate the ethics behind research.
The scheme highlighted for him "a need for more scientists in Parliament," and not only is it a "fascinating life," but "you have the possibility of doing good for society in general".
- Will there still be a need for biological scientists if the economy continues to decline? - There are so few positions relative to the number of postdocs, but I feel I have good training and would be competitive.
There is a need for concerned scientists to reach a better consensus about the health effects of radiation and to communicate effectively with the lay public.
