The phrase "a narrow value of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing specific measurements, limits, or ranges in various contexts, such as mathematics, statistics, or economics.
Example: "The experiment yielded a narrow value of 2.5 for the optimal temperature."
Alternatives: "a limited range of" or "a specific value of".
The results of the comparative mycelium linear growth rate examination covering a wide temperature range (12 47°C) showed that most strains presented their optima at a narrow value area of 27 32°C (Table 2).
The PL peak intensity was enhanced by 2.8 times, and a narrow FWHM value of 19.6 nm was obtained compared to the ZnO nanorods grown without the seed layer as shown in the inset of Figure 3.
Now imagine someone arguing that a quarter and an intrinsically indiscernible slug do in fact share a kind of value: narrow value.
SiO2 vs. TDS plot of both the seasons shows almost similar trend with most of the samples showing a very high TDS value for a narrow range of silica values.
47 For example, of 53 endurance athletes studied in our laboratory, 89% displayed HVR values between 0.03 and 0.45 L/min/%SaO2, a narrow range of values which makes a correlational analysis between HVR and performance decline at altitude less meaningful.
In wealthy countries the dominant approach to priority setting has been Health Technology Assessment (HTA) – evidence based medicine and cost-effectiveness – which is helpful, but insufficient because HTA focuses on only a narrow range of values – benefit and efficiency – and not the full range of values that are relevant to priority setting, including legitimacy and fairness[ 1].
In less wealthy countries the dominant approach to priority setting has been Burden of Disease (BOD) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), which is also helpful, but insufficient because it focuses on a narrow range of values – need and efficiency – and not the full range of relevant values, including legitimacy and fairness.
In less wealthy countries the dominant approach to priority setting has been Burden of Disease (BOD) and cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA), which is helpful, but insufficient because it focuses on a narrow range of values – need and efficiency – and not the full range of relevant values, including legitimacy and fairness.
Adjusting for sample temperature, a narrow range of values for the apparent homogeneous Fe(II) oxidation rate constant (k1′) of 0.5 1.7 times the reference value of k1 = 3 × 10−12 mol/L/min (for pH 5 8 and 20 °C), reported by Stumm and Morgan (1996), was indicated by the calibrated models for the 5-km streachreach below the CMD outfalls and the aerated CMD.
