The phrase "a much smaller value" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when comparing quantities or measurements to indicate that one value is significantly less than another.
Example: "The new model has a much smaller value for energy consumption compared to the previous version."
Alternatives: "a significantly lower value" or "a considerably reduced value."
In order to fit the muscarine data a much smaller value of was needed (0.17).
In our case, we obtain a much smaller value: ∼0.15 mm/year which in addition, is similar to the expected forcing from Rz or aa.
In the experiments, we set to 40, that is, a much smaller value than the above criterion to clearly show the difference of the reconstruction performance between the proposed method and the conventional methods.
On the other hand, our method sets the value of to a much smaller value than the number of known pixels within the target patch, and the maximum range of the SSIM index is limited to one.
An advantage of the hybrid B scheme is that it is able to achieve better OOBE suppression with a much smaller value of J compared with the constituent N-continuous scheme.
In the hybrid system of Au nanorods and J-aggregates, which was fabricated in a similar fashion as that of the gold nanostars, a dip at 595 nm (Figure 4b, cyan curve) with Rabi splitting of 185 meV is observed, which is a much smaller value than that demonstrated above for the nanostar-based hybrid system.
This difference between SWA and SWB results could be clearly observed while comparing the December 2014 and December 2015 solstices (Fig. 5a, c, right panels), where an increased separation between satellites (from 0.7 1.0 to 2.6 2.9 h) leads to a much smaller values of the occurrence rates derived from the SWB observations.
It can be seen that the stress slightly decreases with the increase of the vibration amplitude while it decreases rapidly to a much small value when the amplitude becomes large.
Nevertheless, as Watkins et al. suppose, there is a considerable difference compared to the much smaller value of R they obtain for supported single bilayers.
Theoretically, because ({varvec{{n}}}_{{varvec{{S}}}}) always has a positive value and ({varvec{{n}}}_{{varvec{{D}}}}) has much smaller value than ({varvec{{n}}}_{{varvec{{S}}}}), ({varvec{{n}}}) always has a positive value and can be produced in any direction.
Estimation shows the present data of 2.9 mm could be transformed to be much smaller value, if the flow is free from the effect of surface wakes.
