The phrase "a much lower effective" is not correct as it is incomplete and lacks context.
It could be used in a context where you are comparing effectiveness, but it needs to be followed by a noun to clarify what is being referred to.
Example: "The new policy resulted in a much lower effective rate of compliance among employees."
Alternatives: "significantly reduced effectiveness" or "considerably lower efficiency."
On the bottom line it was an 8% beat, due to a much lower effective tax rate of 28.2% versus estimated 31.0% and 34.0% in the prior period.
Economists have also questioned whether anyone would actually get stuck paying the top rate, since even those with France's top rate typically have a much lower effective rate.
But he also wanted to close tax loopholes that allow many companies to pay a much lower effective corporate tax rate.
The headline corporate income tax rate in the US is 35%, but Shire – like many global drugs and technology groups– has for years managed to maintain a much lower effective tax rate, thanks in large part to complex tax planning.
Many pay at a much lower effective rate, taking advantage of numerous tax breaks and loopholes and using aggressive tax strategies to shift profits to more generous tax territories abroad.
Looking at Mr. Ross's taxes as a share of adjusted gross income yields a much lower effective tax rate of 20 percent, which is actually on the low side for someone whose income is probably in the top 1 percent.
Nevertheless, our observations lead us to conclude that long-term slip events (i.e., those with V r much less than approximately 0.1 m/s) (e.g., Radiguet et al., 2011; Kobayashi, 2014) probably occur within a region of much lower effective normal stress, even if liz/ctl is assumed to be present along the slab-mantle interface.
Subaqueous landslides are known to travel with much lower effective friction than subaerial ones (e.g., De Blasio et al. 2006).
This effective cutoff rigidity typically has a much lower value than the effective rigidity described here.
Meanwhile, by dividing the total amount of radiation emitted by CT scans in 2006 by the total U.S. population, the National Council on Radiation Protection & Measurements calculated a much lower average per-capita effective dose of 3.0 mSv.
A Gd contrast agent that exhibits higher contrast potency at a much lower Gd dose that is effective for use in renal impaired subjects is urgently needed.
